Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Feb 2007 18:45 UTC, submitted by GhePeU
X11, Window Managers David Reveman writes: "I'd like to get all of you updated on the compiz related things discussed at the X developer conference that was held last week. My talk was mainly focused on 'what's next' and how to get desktop compositing in X to the next level." He also discussed the fork: "I had the chance to talk to Quinn Storm from the beryl project during xdevconf. I would have hoped that the current situation with beryl could be improved but it seems like Quinn at least isn't interested in that. However, after talking to Quinn it's very clear to me that the fork was partially motivated by assumptions that were wrong."
Thread beginning with comment 214149
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: The problem with beryl
by fredb1974 on Sun 18th Feb 2007 16:00 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: The problem with beryl"
fredb1974
Member since:
2006-01-31

So, you can tell me what I see on my computer better than me ? About speed display ? Tweaking ?

Are you some kind of god or what ? ;)

"Yes, beryl development is apparently more active than compiz's because they sacrifice lots of good software engineering practices and make stupid in order to progress quicker."

I can see what's happening simply, on every single day. I don't care a bit about your trolling and other FUD you're writting.

Bad luck for you, my last attempt was early last month.

So, stop saying nonsense and other crap. Compiz is slower, harder to tweak.

Gnome Compiz Manager is not an official compiz tool, after all.

It takes me 20 minutes (18 building) to set beryl on my computer.

I use SVN every single day. So, please, stop your lies and try using beryl instead of spitting on its face and on beryl coders.

Reply Parent Score: -1