Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Feb 2007 22:23 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 216117
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Konqueror and others ?
by stestagg on Sat 24th Feb 2007 17:19
in reply to "RE: Konqueror and others ?"




Member since:
2005-08-29
I switched from Firefox to Konqueror (for those who don't know, it comes with KDE) a long time ago because Konq to me feels much faster; Maybe due to it using the same libraries as KDE (like IE <> explorer?) or how simple/small it is.
But anyway, my question, I wonder how secure it really is.. If it would have the same situations as firefox did when it hit fame and propper use..
Which also makes me wonder if Opera is that famous for all the bugs and security flaws to be discovered..
While i'm at it, what about the command line links/lynx ?
Anyway, I guess my point is, every software, open or closed, has its bugs, flaws, and security issues.. What makes one distinguished is not the number of flaws discovered in a day, but how many of them are fixed and how quickly.
Cheers for Firefox.