Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 17th Mar 2007 00:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 222146
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: laptop responsiveness
by Eugenia on Sat 17th Mar 2007 04:45
in reply to "RE[2]: laptop responsiveness"
RE[4]: laptop responsiveness
by broch on Sat 17th Mar 2007 05:17
in reply to "RE[3]: laptop responsiveness"
shrug,
all my hardware works, software too. In 2002 most linux distros had a lot of problems with a lot of hardware. Nowadays this is not the case (mostly).
Problems listed make Ubuntu still "enthusiast OS" not mainstream.
Again, it is not how much you or I spent on Arch configuration, but about Feisty for average user. I doubt that average user will be pleased with scratchy sound not to mention other problems.
RE[4]: laptop responsiveness
by superstoned on Sat 17th Mar 2007 12:53
in reply to "RE[3]: laptop responsiveness"




Member since:
2006-05-04
I have Arch on HP Pavilion dv5000. It took me 1 day to make everything work. More or less as much time as average user needs to customize OS to her/his liking.
I am not advertising Arch or Slack (this is only response to sidenote about difficulties wih KISS distros), whole point is that Fiesty is not "plug-and-play". In contrast to let's say Slack, Ubuntu wants to compete on with windows for the same mainstream group of users. Concluding from your review, Faisty simply failed.
I installed first BSD in 94-95' and first linux (RH) in 96'. I don't think that this matters. Ubuntu is targetting users with no experience.