Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 24th Mar 2007 18:55 UTC, submitted by irbis
X11, Window Managers "The Compiz and Beryl teams are discussing a merger. Posts on the Compiz forum and Beryl mailing list indicate that the projects are discussing how to execute a merger and work together to deliver a single compositing window manager to give 'bling' to the Linux desktop."
Thread beginning with comment 224334
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Another joint
by xultz on Sat 24th Mar 2007 19:49 UTC
Member since:

One day the KDE and Gnome teams will merge too.
One day...

Reply Score: 4

RE: Another joint
by malla on Sat 24th Mar 2007 19:55 in reply to "Another joint"
malla Member since:

One day Novell and Microsoft will merge as well? any takers?

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Another joint
by brother bloat on Sat 24th Mar 2007 20:10 in reply to "Another joint"
brother bloat Member since:

Wishful thinking, but still: imagine a desktop environment with the simplicity and well-designed interfaces we see in Gnome, but with the optional customizability we've got in KDE.

Or what about if the various distros could decide on a unified package manager? Maybe software would spread faster if it was easy to install anywhere?

Or perhaps eliminating the idea of "distros" altogether? Something like the idea described here:

for a start?

Competition is healthy; maybe it's a good thing in the long run. However, I do sometimes wonder what the open source community could accomplish if we spent just a bit less time competing with each other and instead used it to make existing software better and make new ideas a reality.

In any case, I think this merge is a small (but appreciated) step in the right direction.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: Another joint
by nzMM on Sat 24th Mar 2007 21:34 in reply to "RE[2]: Another joint"
nzMM Member since:

A point that made Ubuntu more successful than Debian was that Ubuntu narrowed its scope, officially focusing on a main core. If Ubuntu tries to be infinately flexible that may undermine a big part of the current formula that has brought it soo much good fortune.

So i would be wary of something that suggested allot of customisation, but perhaps a couple of checkboxes asking how you would use your PC, i.e. server, desktop, multimedia, composite etcetera could be good. Maybe even some preconfigured themes, say a half dozen, of which you can preview online and choose one to be your default post-installation.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Another joint
by deb2006 on Sun 25th Mar 2007 18:39 in reply to "RE[2]: Another joint"
deb2006 Member since:

It won't happen - and that's good. I don't want a Ubuntu kernel. That's only for a start. I want a rock solid Debian system, and I don't care if it has Gnome 2.14, 16 or 18. This may be important for Ubuntu, SUSE, Fedora - for other distributions it is not vitally important.

Anyway - every distribution has Linux, every distribution has Gnome, KDE, the GNU tools, and the LSB. What else do we need? I don't want "Ubuntu" (any name might do) everywhere - that's a nightmare. I want specialized distributions, and I want three or four "big" distributions, that are out for a challenge (Ubuntu, SUSE, Fedora, Debian).

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: Another joint
by Babi Asu on Sun 25th Mar 2007 09:34 in reply to "Another joint"
Babi Asu Member since:

One day, the gazillions linux distro will merge into FreeLinux, NetLinux and OpenLinux.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Another joint
by Constantine XVI on Mon 26th Mar 2007 00:42 in reply to "RE: Another joint"
Constantine XVI Member since:

I see the humor, but the BSD's went in reverse of that.
FreeBSD was a fork of 386BSD
NetBSD was also a fork of 386BSD
OpenBSD was a fork of NetBSD

Reply Parent Score: 1