To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
>> Your statement is unfortunately now out of date,
>> since February this year.
Which would mean something if most corporations aren't still maintaining applications written in VB5 and earlier - which means all that .NET stuff means exactly two things.
... and Jack left town, took his **** with him.
Ever been at a company where they expect you to maintain a decade old VB3 application, and when you suggest rebuilding it on a new platform run the risk of getting fired for daring to SUGGEST such a 'radical and dangerous change'?
Also worth mentioning that while mono lets you RUN .NET code, it doesn't have an equaivalent development environment for the *nix platform. Sorry, but Stetic is a tinker toy (even it's developers admit that).
As a certain MS executive said: "Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers!!!"
... and they don't care how stupid they are. Even with mono the entrance fee on the IQ meter is pretty damned high.
Edited 2007-04-03 03:38




Member since:
2007-02-17
{Remember, writing a program for linux takes actual skill and knowledge, while any twelve year old script kiddy can make a program in visual basic}
Your statement is unfortunately now out of date, since February this year.
http://reddevnews.com/features/article.aspx?editorialsid=708
"Mono enables Windows .NET developers to code in C# or VB.NET using Visual Studio and .NET 1.1 or 2.0 development technologies, and then compile and run .NET code base on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, Sun Solaris, Unix and Mac OS X. Mono supports multiple languages, and both open source and commercial compilers. In February, Mono released the Mono Visual Basic Compiler, which .NET developers can use to program in Visual Basic.NET. The new compiler is written in Visual Basic and is "self-hosting."