Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Apr 2007 21:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 228821
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: RE[11]: Berd Korz' blog offline
by Leszek Lesner on Sun 8th Apr 2007 21:23
in reply to "RE[4]: RE[10]: Berd Korz' blog offline"
RE[6]: RE[12]: Berd Korz' blog offline
by tonestone57 on Sun 8th Apr 2007 21:42
in reply to "RE[5]: RE[11]: Berd Korz' blog offline"
I won't say or write anything from what I am not 100 percent sure or anything that I know only from hearsay.
So that you're aware, unless you have seen the original contracts between Mr Korz & Be / Palm yourself then your comments will be nothing more than a story ( or falsehood ).
I'm making this point again because I don't think you've seen the original license agreements and even if you have, they still are subject to interpretation, so I feel this issue is better resolved in the court system ( or between Access & Bernd ).
But, if you feel the urge to comment on it next week, then by all means do so.
Take care Leszek & read my following post.




Member since:
2005-12-31
Leszek, you should not say anything - because as I told Rafael, without signed / legal documentation to back stuff up, then you are just passing off hearsay.
You should let Bernd, Access & Magnussoft figure this out. You need paperwork from Be Inc, Palm or Bernd to substantiate ( confirm ) what you tell people. Because Bernd just telling you how things are or what happended is not proof enough.
** Only official sources ( those directly involved in this legal matter ) should comment and give details ( their side of things ). **