Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Jun 2007 16:38 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 245234
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Solving the wrong problem
by christucker on Mon 4th Jun 2007 19:21
in reply to "RE: Solving the wrong problem"
I would argue that OPIUM is much simpler than APT in the way it solves dependencies. :-) We make a trivial rewriting of the problem into a logical form, and then just throw it at an off-the-shelf solver to give us an answer. No mucking about with traversing graphs, choosing which path to take, back-tracking, or anything. Sometimes simplicity comes from an elegant new representation, not from a reduction in flexibility or power.
RE[3]: Solving the wrong problem
by Tom5 on Mon 4th Jun 2007 20:41
in reply to "RE[2]: Solving the wrong problem"
I would argue that OPIUM is much simpler than APT in the way it solves dependencies.
Simpler, but with the same problems.
As I understand it, your success criteria is that the new package is installed and a minimum of other packages are removed. So, if I ask OPIUM to install "abiword" and it removes "gimp" in the process then that is a successful (and optimal) installation as far as the paper is concerned.
To a user, that probably looks more like failure! The real optimal solution is to install abiword without uninstalling anything.
RE[4]: Solving the wrong problem
by leibowitz on Mon 4th Jun 2007 23:28
in reply to "RE[2]: Solving the wrong problem"







Member since:
2005-07-12
I completely agree.
Package manager seem to get increasingly complex while they should strive for simplicity.
Zeroinstall has my support.