Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Jun 2007 11:50 UTC, submitted by Michael
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris "There's a problem with Solaris and Sun knows it. The installation experience of Solaris (along with other areas) could be greatly improved. The installer doesn't 'suck' as it's easy and known to Solaris administrators, but for a Linux or Windows user it could prove to be a bit challenging. For those of you that have never tried out Solaris, what we've decided to do is to show you this 'usability gap' with the installation process in Solaris compared to Linux. Is the experience really that bad?"
Thread beginning with comment 250701
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: From my experience ...
by Robert Escue on Tue 26th Jun 2007 15:09 UTC in reply to "From my experience ..."
Robert Escue
Member since:
2005-07-08

What did you specify during the installation that caused a dependency issue? Did you get updated drivers from HP before you started the install?

I actually had more trouble installing Solaris 9 on a DL360 than Solaris 10, but I also had all of HP's updated drivers.

While a Solaris x86 install is not perfect, there is also a lot to be said about being prepared to install Solaris (or any other OS) for that matter.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: From my experience ...
by Ookaze on Tue 26th Jun 2007 19:49 in reply to "RE: From my experience ..."
Ookaze Member since:
2005-11-14

There were dependencies from the start. I selected the core install, which is supposed to have very few packages.
The basic Java dependencies necessary for the installation of the other CD after reboot wasn't selected. It worked like package management on any Linux distro, except that it didn't resolve them, and I had to do it by hand.

Reply Parent Score: 2

binarycrusader Member since:
2005-07-06

There were dependencies from the start. I selected the core install, which is supposed to have very few packages.
The basic Java dependencies necessary for the installation of the other CD after reboot wasn't selected. It worked like package management on any Linux distro, except that it didn't resolve them, and I had to do it by hand.


Which is why Sun only supports a full installation for many cases.

Their support documents clearly state that certain installation configurations cannot be supported by them.

They give you the power to make your life difficult ;)

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: From my experience ...
by Ookaze on Tue 26th Jun 2007 19:55 in reply to "RE[2]: From my experience ..."
Ookaze Member since:
2005-11-14

That's really sad, because I had to install, for my tests, RHEL servers too, and both RHEL 4 and RHEL 5 were a breeze to install compared to the Solaris 10.
I forgot the fact that I had to monitor all the installation process in order to not miss some steps, which use defaults after a time limit, if you're not there to change them.

Reply Parent Score: 2