Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 22nd Jul 2007 15:26 UTC
Windows Microsoft is planning to ship its next major version of Windows - known internally as version '7' - within roughly three years, CNET News.com has learned. The company discussed Windows 7 on Thursday at a conference for its field sales force in Orlando, Fla., according to sources close to the company. While the company provided few details, Windows 7, the next client version of the operating system, will be among the steps taken by Microsoft to establish a more predictable release schedule, according to sources. The company plans a more 'iterative' process of information disclosure to business customers and partners, sources said.
Thread beginning with comment 257377
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Heh...
by KenJackson on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 04:29 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Heh..."
KenJackson
Member since:
2005-07-18

The 4GB limit applies to each process. Even the original i386 processor could directly address 64TB of RAM.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Heh...
by japh on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 09:47 in reply to "RE[3]: Heh..."
japh Member since:
2005-11-11

The 4GB limit applies to each process.

Not in vista, 32-bit. XP could use PAE, but 32-bit Vista won't, which seems to be an artificial limitation.

Unfortunately I can't find a good link, but search the net and you'll find lots of people who have been trying to get 4GB to work in Vista.

edit: found a link.
http://help.lockergnome.com/vista/Vista-32bit-recognize-memory-ftop...

Edited 2007-07-23 09:57

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Heh...
by christian on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 11:54 in reply to "RE[3]: Heh..."
christian Member since:
2005-07-06

The original i386 could only address 4GB RAM. It had only 32 address bus lines.

The first x86 to break this barrier was the Pentium Pro, which had 36 address bits, hence 64GB RAM.

I don't know of any processors that can address 64TB of RAM.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Heh...
by japh on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 21:07 in reply to "RE[4]: Heh..."
japh Member since:
2005-11-11

32 bit address bus translates to 2^32 addresses, that much is true.
But, it doesn't mean that an OS running on a CPU with 32 bits address bus can only do 4 GB.

Here's how it can be done:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension

Solaris, Linux and Windows XP all support more than 4 GB of physical memory while being 32 bit for example.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Heh...
by viton on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 15:23 in reply to "RE[3]: Heh..."
viton Member since:
2005-08-09

i386 processor could directly address 64TB of RAM.
OMFG!!!

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Heh...
by KenJackson on Tue 24th Jul 2007 02:50 in reply to "RE[4]: Heh..."
KenJackson Member since:
2005-07-18

That was from memory, but it turns out that the 64TB limit is virtual memory. So sorry.

Reply Parent Score: 2