Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2007 13:16 UTC, submitted by steverez1
Thread beginning with comment 265611
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: yes, it's truly revolutionary :->
by jayson.knight on Sat 25th Aug 2007 07:48
in reply to "RE: yes, it's truly revolutionary :->"
RE[3]: yes, it's truly revolutionary :->
by kmarius on Sat 25th Aug 2007 08:47
in reply to "RE[2]: yes, it's truly revolutionary :->"
RE[4]: yes, it's truly revolutionary :->
by cg0def on Sat 25th Aug 2007 19:19
in reply to "RE[2]: yes, it's truly revolutionary :->"
and silverlight doesn't use ajax? How do you suppose that all those pretty pictures show up your screen then?
I never thought I would say this but Silverlight is some of MS' better work and it's actually almost great. Well it would be if it was oss. It uses much less resources than flash and looks just as good. The site though sux. Seriously out of all the ideas that one can come up with MS decided to go with this one as a demo? Do they really think that people a desperately in need of pretty pictures when they are searching for a link to another site?






Member since:
2005-06-30
I tried to install Silverlight, and after 90% it failed. I was then sent to this page, with details about the user friendly workaround. It probably didn't like that I chose "Run" instead of "Save" when I clicked on the download link...
http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/help.aspx?errorID=2
Update: I followed the instructions and it still wouldn't install...
Update 2: Not only did I have to download the alpha version, but the instructions were incomplete. I had to type "install.exe" after step 9. I was not impressed by Tafiti. Most of the "Silverlight" features could be simplified using Javascript. There's no reason to add all that animation just to click the "news" button...
Edited 2007-08-24 20:57