Linked by Kroc on Thu 30th Aug 2007 13:03 UTC
Editorial I hear often that when something new appears that "competition is good". The primary reasons competition is seen as good, are: it drives down prices; it gives consumers more choice; it pushes technology forward, quicker. Competition is not good because: competition is why consumers have to choose between HD-DVD and BluRay; competition is why DRM exists; and more. In this article, each of the supposed benefits of competition will be looked at in more detail.
Thread beginning with comment 267024
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Mod me down, but...
by Kroc on Thu 30th Aug 2007 15:16 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Mod me down, but..."
Member since:

I don't care a jot about literary terms for these things, they only serve to set up A vs. B scenarios. This is reality, and consumers are being screwed over by companies more and more. If I lend my neighbour a cup of sugar, that makes me a full card carrying Marxist, because I'm helping others out?

It seems to me that in this thread, the hardline is that "Society dictates that I must screw over every other guy in the world to be the best, and that's 'good' for everybody". I'm not talking about governments and stuff - I'm just talking about nerds doing the best for technology.

I suppose my na´vetÚ shows, some people seem to launch into an attack whenever they smell the whiff of this so-called "marxism".

I think I'm going to go take a break by punching everybody I meet in the street ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2