Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 31st Aug 2007 08:35 UTC, submitted by lomax
FreeBSD "Welcome to the home page of the finstall project, accepted for Google's Summer of Code 2007. This project aims to create a user-friendly graphical installer for FreeBSD & FreeBSD-derived systems. The project should yield something usable for 7.0-RELEASE, but the intention is to keep it as a "second" installer system during 7.x, alongside sysinstall. In any case, sysinstall will be kept for architectures not supported by finstall (e.g. all except i386 and amd64)." A first version has been released.
Thread beginning with comment 267282
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nice, but why?
by theraven1982 on Fri 31st Aug 2007 09:41 UTC
theraven1982
Member since:
2007-06-17

Although I admire the effort, this is mostly interesting for less 'technical' users... which are better served with PC-BSD or DesktopBSD. Sysinstall has its shortcomings, but it's proven/reliable/stable.

It looks really great, but I can't help but think it could be better when they would work together with the PC-BSD/DesktopBSD guys. At least they have the same goals.

Reply Score: 3

RE: Nice, but why?
by Daniel Seuffert on Fri 31st Aug 2007 13:19 in reply to "Nice, but why?"
Daniel Seuffert Member since:
2005-08-02

I'm sorry but speaking for DesktopBSD (and PC-BSD as well in absence of Antik, Kris Moore, Charles Landemaine or anybody else from there) I can tell you the concept of finstall is totally different from those of DesktopBSD and PC-BSD and I cannot see any benefit of mixing ideas or the like. finstall aims to be a long term replacement of the aged sysinstall as a general purpose installer including PXE etc., the idea of an installer for a DesktopBSD-FreeBSD-project is totally different, see the upcoming DesktopBSD 1,6 release or RC3 yet with a graphical Grub-menu etc. It's not only the mere size or using kdebase and Qt, it's about matching specific demands and not general purpose.

I will not go in any technical details here because this place is not appropriate imho but I think you got the message.

Best regards, Daniel

Reply Parent Score: 6