Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 31st Aug 2007 19:17 UTC, submitted by ganges master
Thread beginning with comment 267627
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes, I'm aware that the 2.x branch will be maintained for years to come. But put it this way: If Python was just like Microsoft, they would wrap 2.4 into a new package, add a JavaScript utility and call it 3.0, and six months later they would release Python 95
Thank God (or someone, I dunno) that there're still sensible people in this world 






Member since:
2005-11-11
You do know that they're making the "incompatible" 3.0 version in parallel with the 2.6, beackwards compatible version, right?
So for a long time, there will be a new, backwards compatible Python version as well as the 3.0
So I think they're aware that the backwards compatibility is important, while at the same time understanding that it will sometimes stand in the way of progress.