Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Sep 2007 17:24 UTC, submitted by Rahul
AMD LWN.net writes: "A quick report from the kernel summit: AMD's representative at the summit has announced that the company has made a decision to enable the development of open source drivers for all of its (ATI) graphics processors from the R500 going forward. There will be specifications available and a skeleton driver as well; a free 2D driver is anticipated by the end of the year. The rest will have to be written; freeing of the existing binary-only driver is not in the cards, and 'that is better for everybody'. Things are looking good on this front. More in the kernel summit report to come."
Thread beginning with comment 268935
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Hooray!
by jaylaa on Wed 5th Sep 2007 18:00 UTC
jaylaa
Member since:
2006-01-17

This is pretty sweet.

And now I'll be a shit-kicking jerk: to all those "pragmatists" who used to claim we should be grateful that they are making drivers for us at all and that we should just be happy with the binary drivers, look at what being a purist can get you. If the "zealots" hadn't kept at it, insisting that ATI open up, they wouldn't have.

RE: Hooray!
by spikeb on Wed 5th Sep 2007 18:10 in reply to "Hooray!"
spikeb Member since:
2006-01-18

amen to that. very, very true.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE: Hooray!
by jadeshade on Wed 5th Sep 2007 20:01 in reply to "Hooray!"
jadeshade Member since:
2007-07-10

The "pragmatists" get to use the OSS drivers too, you know - and I don't think anyone was grateful for the huge, seeping mess that was the fglrx driver. nvidia, on the other hand...

(don't hurt me, I'm using intel)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Hooray!
by hobgoblin on Wed 5th Sep 2007 20:37 in reply to "RE: Hooray!"
hobgoblin Member since:
2005-07-06

this kinda reminds me of unions...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Hooray!
by tyrione on Thu 6th Sep 2007 05:35 in reply to "Hooray!"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

Hate to burst your bubble, but Intel, Dell, HP and others running Linux made it clear that AMD better get off their butts and make inroads or lose this opportunity.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 6

RE[2]: Hooray!
by spikeb on Thu 6th Sep 2007 08:26 in reply to "RE: Hooray!"
spikeb Member since:
2006-01-18

which they wouldn't have done unless a sizable and vocal part of the community wanted it

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: Hooray!
by jaylaa on Thu 6th Sep 2007 13:51 in reply to "Hooray!"
jaylaa Member since:
2006-01-17

Hate to burst your bubble, but Intel, Dell, HP and others running Linux made it clear that AMD better get off their butts and make inroads or lose this opportunity.

Yes, and? They are some of the purists I was talking about, at least the people in those companies pushing for this. The purists aren't just individuals who are into the philosophy of Free software for moral reasons, they are also open source purists who know that the model works better in many situations. And they include some companies.

Edited 2007-09-06 13:55

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Hooray!
by edwdig on Thu 6th Sep 2007 14:25 in reply to "RE[2]: Hooray!"
edwdig Member since:
2005-08-22

Yes, and? They are some of the purists I was talking about, at least the people in those companies pushing for this. The purists aren't just individuals who are into the philosophy of Free software for moral reasons, they are also open source purists who know that the model works better in many situations. And they include some companies.

The major OEMs pushing for this weren't listening to purists. They were just being practical. ATI's Linux drivers were a complete joke, making it infeasible to ship a laptop with Linux and an ATI graphics card.

The Linux kernel development model intentionally makes closed source drivers a pain to work with, so open source drivers make more sense from a practical standpoint.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1