'Linux Losing Market Share to Windows Server'
Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 26th Oct 2007 05:34 UTC, submitted by WillM
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y "Experts say that migrations from Unix to Linux have slowed down because all the low-hanging fruit has now been picked. Linux growth in the U.S. x86 server market has, over the past six quarters, started to falter and reverse its positive course relative to Windows Server and the market as a whole." More here.
E-mail Print r 1   98 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/ej2
Thread beginning with comment 281146
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Lettherebemorelight
Member since:
2005-07-11

This article, sad to say is not exactly news. This has been reported in many other channels. You are looking for a conspiracy where none exists.

That would be easier to swallow if the ad/article in question wasn't covered in MS ads. I don't think it is so much a conspiracy as it is MS just up to their old tricks of purchasing lip service.

Anyone half in tune to the market would have told you that as businesses finished migrating to Linux from Unix, sales would slow down. What is so difficult to understand about this.

You cant accurately determine the market share by sales of an OS, when you can get that OS for free. What is so difficult to understand about that?

Don't get me wrong...it is possible that Linux adoption could be slowing, but trying to convince IT people to take MS's word for it could very well be an exercise in futility.

Edited 2007-10-26 20:41

Reply Parent Score: 2

tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

That would be easier to swallow if the ad/article in question wasn't covered in MS ads. I don't think it is so much a conspiracy as it is MS just up to their old tricks of purchasing lip service.


Look at it this way: Who is going to pay for Linux ads? Look, the original poster was correct. You're looking for dirty tricks when, in fact, unbridled over-optimism is the enemy here. People mistakenly thought that growth in the Linux market was coming at the expense of Microsoft; however, in fact, what's happened here is exactly what the article says: Shops running expensive proprietary Unix versions moved to lower-cost Linux distros. When this migration started to dry up, Linux adoption was bound to suffer.

You cant accurately determine the market share by sales of an OS, when you can get that OS for free. What is so difficult to understand about that?


The vast majority of organizations deploying Linux are commercial in nature and obtain their OS preinstalled when they purchase hardware; in addition, those same organizations are getting support contracts at the same time. This is reality. So, in fact while not perfect, hardware deployments track closely to OS market share. You may not like that, but it's true.

Don't get me wrong...it is possible that Linux adoption could be slowing, but trying to convince IT people to take MS's word for it could very well be an exercise in futility.


IT people don't need to take *anyone's* word for it. They know their own needs. Those needs are reflected in these latest sales statistics -- and they show that Linux deployments have reached a saturation point. The only way for them to continue growing is to move into markets which are currently dominated by Windows (CRM, etc).

Reply Parent Score: -1

ari-free Member since:
2007-01-22

all Microsoft needs to do is fend off commercial linux vendors like redhat. If they can do that, there is very little chance that linux could promote itself on its own. Linux doesn't have a "Steve Jobs"

Reply Parent Score: 1