Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th Nov 2007 21:38 UTC, submitted by SK8T
Thread beginning with comment 283238
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I am not sure what this means? Can someone take the source and do the same thing that CentOS did with RH?
Simply put, no.
Darwin != Mac OS X, rather it's the kernel and much of the base, system level userland. But you won't find things like the Finder or the Dock, or even the windowing system in the source code.
It's more like a basic BSD distribution, but without as large of a ports directory.
RE[2]: what does this mean?
by zizban on Wed 7th Nov 2007 00:43
in reply to "RE: what does this mean?"
RE[2]: what does this mean?
by Oliver on Thu 8th Nov 2007 00:36
in reply to "RE: what does this mean?"
RE: what does this mean?
by google_ninja on Wed 7th Nov 2007 03:03
in reply to "what does this mean?"
There was an OpenDarwin initiative going on awhile back, but they closed up shop because of a lack of enthusiasm, and not really wanting to be a host for Free OSX projects. The only real reason Darwin is good to have open is for debugging and educational purposes, and of course for people to write drivers for those of us who go the Hackintosh way...
RE[2]: what does this mean?
by Nossie on Wed 7th Nov 2007 06:59
in reply to "RE: what does this mean?"





Member since:
2006-06-08
I am not sure what this means? Can someone take the source and do the same thing that CentOS did with RH?
Before you apple guys get defensive I am just asking.