Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Nov 2007 21:22 UTC, submitted by irbis
Window Managers "Linux has proven amazingly flexible: after nearly 10 years of use, I'm still impressed by how the Linux operating system does exactly what I want on any type of hardware. Desktop customization is no exception; from the ultra-modern KDE and GNOME window managers to with the likes of Fluxbox and AfterStep, there's a Linux desktop to suit everyone."
Thread beginning with comment 285307
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
windowmaker vs. afterstep
by broken_symlink on Mon 19th Nov 2007 23:34 UTC
Member since:

how similar is windowmaker to afterstep? i know windowmaker is really meant to be used with gnustep, but if you don't how is it?

Reply Score: 1

RE: windowmaker vs. afterstep
by zizban on Tue 20th Nov 2007 00:03 in reply to "windowmaker vs. afterstep"
zizban Member since:

Afterstep has a lot of WindowMaker-ism a dock (wharf) and the way it minimizes apps like WindowMaker.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: windowmaker vs. afterstep
by bnolsen on Tue 20th Nov 2007 00:44 in reply to "windowmaker vs. afterstep"
bnolsen Member since:

Similar in look and feel and share some compatiblity in function.

However, the code bases for Afterstep and Windowmaker are vastly different. I believe Windowmaker came about because some people were dissatisfied with Afterstep.

Reply Parent Score: 2