Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sun 6th Jan 2008 07:41 UTC, submitted by Sabz
Thread beginning with comment 294558
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-24
"""
Redhat could always change their minds. They have shown that they are not averse to doing so in the past (see inclusion of mono).
"""
There is no mono in RedHat. Perhaps you are thinking of Fedora.
At any rate, it would be a mistake, and a step backwards, to allow such a critical component to be controlled by such an uncooperative developer. There was a reason that RedHat terminated Mr. Johnson. And there was a reason that Fedora spearheaded forking the project.
The XFree86->Xorg fork, painful as it was, has proven highly beneficial. In the same way, I believe that this fork will also result in long term benefits to the community.