Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Jan 2008 22:35 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems "VIA's newly launched processor architecture, known for the last three years by its codename, "Isaiah," will keep the company's focus on cost and power intact while taking things in a substantially different direction. In short, this year will see something truly odd happen on the low end of the x86 market: VIA and Intel will, architecturally speaking, switch places. Intel will take a giant step down the power/performance ladder with the debut of Silverthorne/Diamondville, its first in-order x86 processor design since the original Pentium, while VIA will attempt to move up into Intel's territory with its first-ever out-of-order, fully buzzword-compliant processor, codenamed Isaiah. In this brief article, I'll give an overview of Isaiah and of what VIA hopes to accomplish with this new design. Most of the high-level details of Isaiah have been known since at least 2004, when VIA began publicizing the forthcoming processor's general feature list (i.e., 64-bit support, out-of-order execution, vector processing, memory disambiguation, and others). So I'll focus here on a recap of those features and on a broader look at the market that VIA is headed into."
Thread beginning with comment 297735
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Actually looks pretty good...
by stestagg on Fri 25th Jan 2008 08:34 UTC in reply to "Actually looks pretty good..."
stestagg
Member since:
2006-06-03

You talk about struggling performance, then you suggest that MythTV would be a good viewing interface??

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

mofojones Member since:
2006-03-27

"You talk about struggling performance, then you suggest that MythTV would be a good viewing interface??"

The keyword here is frontend

Edited 2008-01-25 16:33 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

stestagg Member since:
2006-06-03

If you're talking about the mythtvfrontend package. That is the one with the ridiculous performance issues. If you're talking about a seperate machine acting as a frontend, then having a small-form-factor is somewhat pointless, unless you live in a very small flat.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

galvanash Member since:
2006-01-25

You talk about struggling performance, then you suggest that MythTV would be a good viewing interface??


Im not sure I am parsing your reply correctly, but Ill try. MythTV IS a good viewing interface (imo). The question is whether this chip is suitable for it. In a nutshell I'm saying that VIA's new chip mounted on a nano-ITX epia board _could_ be a wonderful platform for a MythTV frontend. The _could_ meaning there is basically a performance sweetspot for doing 720P decoding - and all this chip has to do is reach it with a bit of breathing room. I dont think it will be able to do 1080P, but 720P is definitely possible.

Not everyone cares about the same things. Many (if not most) people run Myth monolithically. Nothing wrong with that, but I prefer having my backend/tuners in a wiring closet and putting a frontend on each TV. A frontend the size of a small paperback book that can do 720P decoding for less than $400 would be pretty nice (for me anyway - to each his own).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

stestagg Member since:
2006-06-03

You're right, lucidity is not always one of my strong points, and I was a little distracted this morning.

My only point is that for many people, the performance/speed/latency of the mythtv frontend/user interface is not great at all. So much so that my PPC mac-mini [running ubuntu] can't even properly cope with navigating the user interface, let alone playing back video/audio without major frame dropping. I know I am not alone in experiencing this, but maybe we are just a vocal minority of users.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2