Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Feb 2008 20:00 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 302947
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Solaris OS somewhere?
by ashcrow on Fri 29th Feb 2008 02:07
in reply to "RE[2]: Solaris OS somewhere?"
Unstable??????????? Ubuntu? Slackware????????????????????
Can you be more specific?
Thanks.
-2501
Can you be more specific?
Thanks.
-2501
They are stable and fine ... but you have to remember that it comes down to the user base in a lot of cases. The more people who like X means the easier it is to get approval/consensus to use X. While the BSD's are great OS's, there are probably far fewer people pushing for them as there (at least seem to be) fewer users of the OS's. The same thing goes with Slackware. It's a nice and simple distribution but in terms of users it seems to not be very high on the list.
RE[3]: Solaris OS somewhere?
by Sabz on Fri 29th Feb 2008 02:29
in reply to "RE[2]: Solaris OS somewhere?"
RE[4]: Solaris OS somewhere?
by 2501 on Fri 29th Feb 2008 02:37
in reply to "RE[3]: Solaris OS somewhere?"
than you both for your answers.
I understand your point. Fedora seems to be very solid too if NASA is trusting it to manage very important information. I wonder if other goverment agencies is using it since it has a lot of support from system administrators and programmers.
Slackware is my favorite distro but I think that there are not a lot of Slackware fans at NASA.
Anyway, it is good for the Linux/BSD community that they are not relaying on Windows to do the most important jobs. :-)
-2501






Member since:
2005-07-14
Unstable??????????? Ubuntu? Slackware????????????????????
Can you be more specific?
Thanks.
-2501