Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Mar 2008 20:37 UTC, submitted by Kaj de Vos
Thread beginning with comment 307131
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: rewriting the OS
by StephenBeDoper on Sat 29th Mar 2008 15:18
in reply to "RE: rewriting the OS"
A large part of the "middle" layers are pretty standard GNU stuff
Thank you, I've been looking for a succinct description of that factor for a while now.
It's one of the reasons why I'm still cautiously-enthusiastic about Haiku's chances (and Syllable too, of course).
Ten-fiteen years ago, Be Inc. had to license quite a few technologies - AA-capable font rendering, the blade MP3 encoder, various commercial video codecs (Indeo, Cinepak), etc.
The barriers-to-entry are a lot lower for an alt. OS project today. Rather than paying millions of dollars to license various technologies (or paying more to re-implement them), developers of an alt. OS can just make use of existing open-source stuff like Freetype, FFmpeg, LAME, etc.





Member since:
2005-07-06
You're right, it would be. Which is why we don't re-write everything!
A large part of the "middle" layers are pretty standard GNU stuff and other Open Source software such as CUPS which has been ported and integrated into Syllable. Most of the drivers are based on Linux, BSD and X.org sources.
We may be crazy, but we're not that crazy!