Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Apr 2008 19:57 UTC, submitted by Brunis
Thread beginning with comment 307946
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.






Member since:
2006-01-24
I just downloaded the beta and compared them memory-wise on a winxp home machine. I opened the following pages in each browser and checked the memory usage (note! no flash installed and only addon installed is noscript, which worked fine with beta 5):
www.osnews.com
www.zbrushcentral.com
www.conceptart.org
www.cgtalk.com
www.haiku-os.org
Firefox 2.0.0.13 - 42160 kb
Firefox 3 beta 5 - 43096 kb
so in this simple test there were no real differences in memory usage. of the pages I visited all rendered fine in beta 5, could those who complains about badly rendered pages please post some examples?