Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 24th Apr 2008 15:42 UTC, submitted by M-Saunders
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu The Hardy Heron has taken flight: it's the second LTS (Long Term Support) release of the world's most popular distro. New features include the Wubi Windows installer and Firefox 3 beta 5. Grab a copy here, and check out Linux Format's overview of the release.
Thread beginning with comment 311331
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Another Ubuntu
by milles21 on Thu 24th Apr 2008 20:55 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Another Ubuntu"
milles21
Member since:
2006-11-08

Oh yeah maybe your right

XGL = bloat = Novell/OpensUSE,
banshee = bloat = Novell/Opensuse


Oh wait both are in ubuntu, oh and

SLES 10 in tons of businesses uses the opensuse as it's foundation ubuntu not so much!!!!!

Yup sounds all bloated to me you are right I don't want that type of innovation considering that before SLES 10 RHEL was the enterprise standard.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Another Ubuntu
by OMRebel on Thu 24th Apr 2008 21:08 in reply to "RE[3]: Another Ubuntu"
OMRebel Member since:
2005-11-14

openSUSE (which is what we're talking about) is MUCH slower on the same hardware than Ubuntu is. That is a FACT.

As many businesses that I've worked in and seen that use linux, RHEL is the only version that they use. Until Novell does something with Yast (either get rid of it, or fix it), then Suse will continue to be trying to play catchup.

Besides, aren't we focusing on desktops and not servers?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Another Ubuntu
by milles21 on Thu 24th Apr 2008 21:16 in reply to "RE[4]: Another Ubuntu"
milles21 Member since:
2006-11-08

That is where we obviously differ, I have seen atleast 10 companies personlly that have moved from RHEL to SLES 10,
also in 3 of the companies YAST was one of the reasons they chose to move.

YAST may at time be slow however from an administration perspective with junior admins it is functional.

Also I know we are talking Ubuntu and OpenSUSE but Zenworks and SLES are really a winning combo. I am not saying ubuntu is a bad distro I am saying from an innovation perspective I see more of the innovative development coming from the Opensuse community. That does not make ubuntu a bad distro they package really well but that was not what we were discussing.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Another Ubuntu
by suser on Fri 25th Apr 2008 08:52 in reply to "RE[4]: Another Ubuntu"
suser Member since:
2005-08-04

openSUSE (which is what we're talking about) is MUCH slower on the same hardware than Ubuntu is. That is a FACT.


I disagree.
11.0 beta1 faster installation, faster package management and 64bit system done right.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Another Ubuntu
by glimpze777 on Fri 25th Apr 2008 11:52 in reply to "RE[4]: Another Ubuntu"
glimpze777 Member since:
2008-04-25

Are you nuts? I did compare Ubuntu and opensuse on the same hardware but ubuntu crashed! Opensuse works as a charm! its way better that other distro lots of innovation! I'm a school systems administrator and YAST is the best!

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[5]: Another Ubuntu
by segedunum on Fri 25th Apr 2008 14:07 in reply to "RE[4]: Another Ubuntu"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

openSUSE (which is what we're talking about) is MUCH slower on the same hardware than Ubuntu is. That is a FACT.

That is absolute tosh. The fact that you say stuff like this verbatim, and that you've been modded up, shows what we're dealing with - a bunch of people who really believe that Ubuntu is something that it isn't.

Reply Parent Score: 3