Linked by Adam S on Thu 19th Jun 2008 14:47 UTC, submitted by M-Saunders
Thread beginning with comment 319196
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-03-25
Yeah. If you talk about J2EE vs .NET, I'd say .NET takes much less time to get familiar with and the time of development is quite a bit shorter (at least for me).
Many people and businesses would like to host their ASP.NET pages and services, etc. on Linux. Those are somewhat supported by Mono. However, ASP.NET and other technologices "built on" .NET Framework are not "free" like the .NET framework. Which means using Mono to operate your ASP.NET site (etc.) is arguably violating licenses of Mircoroft.
With Novel's deal, people and business can really "feel safe" and use Linux as their web servers while still implementing systems with .NET Framework.
I don't think Novel and businesses are really worry about Microsoft suing them for "patents" on Linux and those foundation open source projects. But definitely, patent and licenses of technologies built on .NET Framework is something to conisider about for businesses.
Edited 2008-06-19 17:22 UTC