Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Jun 2008 23:30 UTC
Morphos In a classic case of "two more weeks", the MorphOS team has actually finally really I'm-not-kidding-you released MorphOS 2.0. This release was long-awaited, and comes packed with so many new features they might as well have called it MorphOS 3.0. "The MorphOS development is proud to announce the public release of the much anticipated version 2.0 of MorphOS. For an overview of the included new features and updates, please read our release notes. A description of the hardware requirements and installation procedures can be found here."
Thread beginning with comment 320749
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Pegasos G3?
by cybergorf on Mon 30th Jun 2008 23:49 UTC in reply to "Pegasos G3?"
cybergorf
Member since:
2008-06-30

YES it will work - since the Pegasos is the main target hardware for this new edition of MorphOS. So you got exactly the right thing at home :-)

here is some installation guide:
http://bigfoot.morphos-team.net/test/MorphOS.readme

hope to read some review soon...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Pegasos G3?
by Eugenia on Mon 30th Jun 2008 23:52 in reply to "RE: Pegasos G3?"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

Thanks for the info.

I just saw that it costs $150. I am not sure I will be purchasing it I am afraid. Not for a machine that I won't be using. Although, I don't mind writing a review if the company that sells it sends me a free key. This way everyone wins.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Pegasos G3?
by erebos on Mon 30th Jun 2008 23:56 in reply to "RE[2]: Pegasos G3?"
erebos Member since:
2006-02-09

You can still test it eugenia, the download available on the official website is a full featured but time limited version (30minutes per boot)

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Pegasos G3?
by jal_ on Tue 1st Jul 2008 07:09 in reply to "RE[2]: Pegasos G3?"
jal_ Member since:
2006-11-02

I just saw that it costs $150. I am not sure I will be purchasing it I am afraid. Not for a machine that I won't be using.


I'm a bit suprised that a) OSNews editors appearently do not communicate on forehand on such a topic (I'd expect Thom to know about this 2003 review?), that b) they need to communicate to each other via the comment section (I'd expect Eugenia to contact Thom directly) and c) that OSNews (being heavily sponsored and all) cannot provide editors with so little as $150 for doing a review.


JAL

Reply Parent Score: 2