Linked by David Adams on Thu 17th Jul 2008 05:59 UTC, submitted by Caffeine Deprived
Thread beginning with comment 323417
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-01-18
Of course Microsoft can make a server that can stay running for three contiguous months. Server 2003 is a pretty good server OS. I'm sure 2008 is a good one as well.
The reality is that Ubuntu and Apple servers aren't down enough for anybody to really notice. It's truly a pointless article.
Now if Ubuntu or Apple servers were down 25% or more this article would have some relevance since the end user might actually notice the down time.