Linked by David Adams on Wed 6th Aug 2008 15:32 UTC
After 10 years of supporting Linux, IBM continues to challenge Microsoft on multiple fronts and aims to push Linux even further into the enterprise. While IBM has competed and partnered with Microsoft over the last two decades, the Microsoft-free PC effort is perhaps its most direct assault yet. "The idea of Microsoft-free personal computing has been in the air for a while," Inna Kuznetsova, director of Linux at IBM, told InternetNews.com. "We're just partnering with Linux distribution vendors and hardware vendors to make it happen."
Thread beginning with comment 325979
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Perhaps in the enterprise, but...
by ichi on Wed 6th Aug 2008 23:07
in reply to "RE[4]: Perhaps in the enterprise, but..."
Member since:2007-03-06
RE[6]: Perhaps in the enterprise, but...
by jbauer on Wed 6th Aug 2008 23:18
in reply to "RE[5]: Perhaps in the enterprise, but..."
Member since:2005-07-06
Or maybe we're facing a worldwide stockholm syndrome 
Right. Mark Shuttleworth must be suffering from that too:
I think we don't yet deliver a good enough user experience. I think we deliver a user experience for people that have a reason to want to be on the Linux platform, either because of price or because of freedom. If that was your primary reason, Linux is the right answer.
But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price, who is not too concerned about freedom, I don't think we can say the Linux desktop offers the very best experience
But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price, who is not too concerned about freedom, I don't think we can say the Linux desktop offers the very best experience
http://derstandard.at/PDA/?id=3413801
RE[5]: Perhaps in the enterprise, but... - specifics?
by jabbotts on Thu 7th Aug 2008 16:15
in reply to "RE[4]: Perhaps in the enterprise, but..."
Member since:2007-09-06
I'd be curiousto read your list of points where an OS based on Linux leaves a lot to be desired.
Are we talking preinstalled on hardware or installed by the home user. General computing tasks or specialty needs like Tivo and video gaming?
I don't know that Vista deserves all the negative publicity it recieves though there is justification for some of it. At the same time, I think OS based on Linux are rarely given honest consideration they deserve; especially with the ongoing "year of the Linux Desktop" crap that people keep drudging up.
(There is no year of the Linux desktop, it already works perfectly well as a desktop or server system depending on the OS distribution.)
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
The point is even WITH Microsoft releasing a dud like Vista, its really hard for an operating like Linux, with plenty of technical merits, to make any inroads.
Or maybe Vista has been badmouth to death but it's actually a reasonably good OS, while Linux on the desktop still leaves a lot to be desired.