Linked by David Adams on Wed 6th Aug 2008 15:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 326106
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2007-09-06
They did, they charged an obsorbitant price for it so everyone stuck with existing but as capable alternatives. If they tried again, they would need to provide the quality and function set that justifies the license cost or re-evaluate pricing strategies.