To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Let's see:
Xandros and Linspire:
1. Offer very few applications packaged.
2. The applications are badly outdated.
3. You pay for them.
Debian and Slackware:
1. Huge software repositories
2. The latest versions available.
3. They are free.
A first grade kid should be able to give the right answer. Are you?
"Debian and Slackware:
1. Huge software repositories
2. The latest versions available.
3. They are free.
A first grade kid should be able to give the right answer. Are you? "
Well beyond first grade actually. I agree that Xandros and Linspire have outdated packages. So does the stable version of Debian. Has been a long time since I tried Slackware. Gentoo has more recent packages.
You might not be so bad if you could get beyond the playground antics 
Um, have you looked at CNR?
Lots of packages there. Just not every single program available for linux.
You sound like an anti-Mac zealot who says "there's no software for the Mac!"
What you need is the best from each kind of software, and CNR had a lot of that available.
Nobody needs 100's of media players. Just the top 3 or 4 are sufficient.
Remember, CNR wasn't about quantity, but quality.
Also, did you volunteer to package and maintain thousands of packages for CNR???
IMHO, Debian is still around because it embodies the spirit of community development. The names change, but Debian lives on forever. The have such a great, open, enduring process.
Meanwhile, Patrick V. is just one very determined, downright stubborn dude who refuses to go away in this age of mega-distros like Suse, Redhat/Fedora and Ubuntu.
2 very different reasons, but they both share one thing - very strong vision.
My fiftieth of a $





Member since:
2005-12-02
"... why distributions such as Slackware and Debian are still around. And why Linspire and such are doomed to fail."
And what pray tell might that reason be? Please share your enlightenment.