Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Aug 2008 15:31 UTC
"Once upon a time, a Linux distribution would be installed with a /dev directory fully populated with device files. Most of them represented hardware which would never be present on the installed system, but they needed to be there just in case. Toward the end of this era, it was not uncommon to find systems with around 20,000 special files in /dev, and the number continued to grow. This scheme was unwieldy at best, and the growing number of hotpluggable devices (and devices in general) threatened to make the whole structure collapse under its own weight. Something, clearly, needed to be done." The solution came in the form of udev, and udev uses rules to determine how it should handle devices. This allows distributors to tweak how they want devices to be handled. "Or maybe not. Udev maintainer Kay Sievers has recently let it be known that he would like all distributors to be using the set of udev rules shipped with the program itself." ComputerWorld dives into the situation.
Thread beginning with comment 327811
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Agreed, but maintain caution
by PlatformAgnostic on Sun 24th Aug 2008 21:20
in reply to "RE[2]: Agreed, but maintain caution"
Member since:2006-01-02
Member since:
2005-10-06
The Windows HAL is not the same as HAL the program, even though they have the same name. HAL the program provides information to user programs about devices and suchlike (the kernel already provided this information; HAL just makes it easier to get it); hal.dll is the lowest level of NT, and performs I/O and handles interrupts for the NT kernel.