To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
We are using zones here, we have only problems.
- unability to patch zones (we are using u3)
- performance problems (thanks to processes block in kernel mode).
- and now the servers reboot itself in u5
Solaris 10 is the most crappy release from Sun. You are taking Sun's blueprints/site like a reliable source. But it's only some ads from Sun, in fact the reality is by far different.
On the other side AIX and LPAR are working like a charm...
Edited 2008-10-15 16:25 UTC
Thats interesting, as where I work is a primarily IBM site, and pSeries/AIX is the buggiest P.O.S I've ever worked on.
LPAR's are not totally separate, I've seen DLPAR operations on one LPAR kill another due to memory conflicts. We frequently see Power5 and 6 boxes drop when they suddenly offline 8gb of RAM, or decide to offline a cpu for laugh.
The IBM VIO server is memory and CPU intensive and prone to having strange issues which you just can't trace through its complicated configuration (why the hell is every network card enX on AIX???).
I guess its what you're used to... I work on AIX and yearn for Sun - looks like you're the other way around!
- unability to patch zones (we are using u3)
U3 is fairly old now.
- performance problems (thanks to processes block in kernel mode).
Can you elaborate on this please? Is there a bugid?
- and now the servers reboot itself in u5
bugid?
Solaris 10 is the most crappy release from Sun. You are taking Sun's blueprints/site like a reliable source. But it's only some ads from Sun, in fact the reality is by far different.
Can you point out which Blueprints are incorrect so
we can get them fixed please. It's also interesting
that you use this argument as a retort - did you
read the article linked by the OP? What would you call
that?
On the other side AIX and LPAR are working like a charm...
charm
⢠noun
1 the power or quality of delighting or fascinating others.
2 a small ornament worn on a necklace or bracelet.
3 an object, act, or saying believed to have magic power.
Seems somehow appropriate given the nature of your
post.





Member since:
2005-07-07
This article is riddled with fundamental inaccuracies. Most of this data has been available for over an year. Very poorly researched.
Scalability -- Only eight CPUs and 64GB RAM on one machine
Sun just announced a 4 chip UltraSPARC T2+ system that has 32 cores and 512GB Memory. Each core runs 8 threads. A domain can be assigned to each of these. So a 4-way UltraSPARC T2+ system can have 256 Logical domains.
http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/t5440/
Sun also has T2+ chip based 2 way and have much larger memory configurations than 64GB.
http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/t5240/
Low end and Midrange with the introduction of T5440.
CPUs can be dynamically added and removed ever since the first release.
http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0207/820-0832.pdf
"All CPUs exposed by the hypervisor are referred to as virtual CPUs. On
platforms supporting logical domains, such as a Sun Fire T1000 and T2000
system, each of the cores of the system has four executing threads, represented
as virtual CPUs by the hypervisor. Thus, an eight-core Sun Fire T2000 server
would have 32 virtual CPUs able to be partitioned between the various logical
domains on the system. With this release of Logical Domains 1.0 software, virtual
CPUs are able to be dynamically reconfigured; that is, removed or added to a
guest logical domain while the guest operating system is running, without
requiring a reboot. Note this requires a specific version of the Solaris Operating
System to be installed in the guest domain and might not work with other
operating environments.
"
You can have 32 domains on T1, 64 on T2, 128 and 256 on T2+ based systems depending on the configuration.
Sun's Logical Domains provides the exact same capabilities. Some how the author missed that while doing research as well.
What could have been a good comparison ends up being a typical IBM marketing FUD piece.
Edited 2008-10-15 16:02 UTC