To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
[quote]and being as cheap as it is, having two copies of optical media is less of a problem then having two copies of a hardrive.[/quote]
Yeah, but it's also a difference if you only need 2x 1 TB of hard drive space, or if you need a few hundred CDs / DVDs
So in that case, I'd rather buy two 1 TB drives to save all my stuff twice instead of burning it to lots and lots of CDs which all last for a few years and then have to be copied again.
imo, time to triage the data then. find out what one really care about and whats "junk" (program related files and so on).
if one where to store that amount of data as physical paper, one would be running out of living space quickly.
but as one can just slap it all onto a device the size of a large book, and stuff it in the back of the closet, one no longer consider the value or waste of it.




Member since:
2005-07-06
yep, i would love to see a hardrive or ssd consist of a collection of smaller parts that one could disassemble and replace without the need for a clean room and identical parts.
thats why im of two minds when it comes to using hardrives as archive media.
they eat up a whole lot of data if they die, and there is basically no chance of recovery save for a expensive specialist company.
with optical media there is more limited space, but you have the reader and the media itself separated, so if the reader dies you can just replace that without risk to the media itself.
and being as cheap as it is, having two copies of optical media is less of a problem then having two copies of a hardrive.