Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 17:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 338090
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Leave it to Microsoft to ruin the perfect idea..
by google_ninja on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 20:25
in reply to "RE[2]: Leave it to Microsoft to ruin the perfect idea.."
The idea behind a symlink is that it points to another file. The idea behind a hardlink is that it is another handle on the file, no different then the first handle on it, just stored in a different logical place.
just google it and you will probably find a billion links to clearer and more succinct explinations than mine ;-)
symlinks are a better idea 99% of the time. when i read that ms was implmenting hard links my first thought was "why?". my guess is that winsxs is one of the only reasons they exist on the platform.
Edited 2008-11-22 20:28 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-24
Ah I see, thanks for that!
I love being corrected when I'm wrong - it's the best way to learn!
So I guess then that hardlinks are designed so that if you overwrite it, the linked file itself is overwritten, and a special procedure is needed to remove the link.
Still, Explorer & any other app should still be able to realize when the file is a link rather than the actual file.
Thanks again :-)
--The loon