Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 15:10 UTC
Editorial InternetNews.com states: "Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today." Most Windows applications come with their own distinctive updating mechanism (much like Mac OS X), instead of having a centralised updating location like most Linux distributions offer. While it certainly wouldn't be harmful for Windows to gain such a feature - the question remains: isn't it time we rethink program installation and management altogether?
Thread beginning with comment 340408
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

There's a reason there are so many different repositories. Every major Linux distribution keeps their own repositories which only contain software and libraries that are tested and known to work and be compatible with eachother. If you install something from a default Ubuntu repository, you can be certain all of it's dependencies will also be there, and be the right version. Adding more repositories in Ubuntu is as trivial as adding a URL to the end of a list. One line, nothing complicated. In the past three years, I have never had a serious problem with package management, no matter how many third party repositories I've added. If having the latest version of a program is more important than having the tested version in the repositories, often you'll find the developers have already packaged it and it just hasn't been accepted into the official repositories yet. I normally add the repository of a program I like to keep up to date (like WINE), and then keeping it up to date is exactly the same as keeping any other program up to date. The same update tool is used, it shows up in your list of updates right next to everything else. It's virtually seamless. Package management in Linux isn't perfect, I'll admit, but in my opinion it is better over-all compared to OS X's and Windows' software installation.


There is a third option that you seem to have missed that uses the package management system, guarantees it will work if you choose the correct source, and does not require you to add extra repositories to your repository list.

An good example of this other "repository-less" method of installing packages for Linux that I speak of can be found here:

http://www.getdeb.net/

Reply Parent Score: 6

Moredhas Member since:
2008-04-10

I use Getdeb when I'm feeling lazy, and only if the version on Getdeb is the latest version of the program I want. Otherwise, I compile from source; but that's a rare occurrence for me too.

Reply Parent Score: 1