Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Jan 2009 12:58 UTC
Windows Even though the EULA accompanying the beta build of Windows 7 prohibits the publication of benchmark results (good luck enforcing that one, Redmond), everybody and their dog will still compare the Windows 7 beta to Vista and Windows XP. Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is one of those benchmarking the beta, and according to his results, the Windows 7 beta beats both Vista and XP in just about every scenario.
Thread beginning with comment 342217
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Figures?
by google_ninja on Sat 3rd Jan 2009 15:38 UTC in reply to "Figures?"
google_ninja
Member since:
2006-02-05

Ive been using it full time for about a month now, and it is noticeably faster then vista, but not much more then that. Where it really shines is boot time. It is faster, and doesn't do that thing where vista thrashes the disc for 5 minutes after boot up.

You can take what I say with a grain of salt though, cause on my hardware I can't really tell a difference in performance between xp and vista.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: Figures?
by Googol on Sun 4th Jan 2009 11:41 in reply to "RE: Figures?"
Googol Member since:
2006-11-24

thrashing discs for 5 minutes ?! lol - go buy a new disc.

Huh, that was difficult !

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2