Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Feb 2009 18:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 348106
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Is it meant for more than hobby?
by rockwell on Thu 12th Feb 2009 17:39
in reply to "Is it meant for more than hobby?"
RE[2]: Is it meant for more than hobby?
by Earl Colby pottinger on Thu 12th Feb 2009 22:02
in reply to "RE: Is it meant for more than hobby?"
Which means you have not tried using the GUI.
OpenTracker (the desktop) has features that I never see in a Windows/Linux/Mac desktop, and they are just a click away. Just because the desktop is not full of worthless flash and eyecandy does not mean the power is not available.
RE[2]: Is it meant for more than hobby?
by umccullough on Fri 13th Feb 2009 18:33
in reply to "RE: Is it meant for more than hobby?"
From the screenshots, it looks like it is meant to compete with Windows 98 at best. Pitiful GUI compared to KDE, GNOME, XP, Vista, OS X.
(emphasis mine)...
See, that's the problem - looks aren't everything.
To me, it looks simple and easy to use - unlike the modern UIs of Vista, KDE, GNOME, etc.
I'm that guy that puts my Windows machine back into "Classic" theme so I don't feel awash in eye candy that makes me want to vomit when using a recent OS.
And OSX doesn't even appeal to people like me - it just looks yucky. Linux can be made tolerable if necessary.







Member since:
2007-02-05
Is this project meant to (eventually) compete with Windows, OS X and Linux-desktops or will be only something for geeks (forever)?
I'd love for desktop-os in general to be more competitive and more innovation happening.