Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 348969
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Google is not one company
by tbscope2 on Sat 14th Feb 2009 20:16
in reply to "RE: Google is not one company"
RE[3]: Google is not one company
by sbergman27 on Sat 14th Feb 2009 20:22
in reply to "RE[2]: Google is not one company"
RE[2]: Google is not one company
by leos on Sat 14th Feb 2009 23:24
in reply to "RE: Google is not one company"
I suspect that they chose QT for Google Earth for reasons relating to your possibility #1: The devs on that particular project were C++ guys. And then possibility #2 took hold as reality set in.
QT always seems to be presented as the "shiny" solution. But where are the results?
QT always seems to be presented as the "shiny" solution. But where are the results?
Well google earth is pretty awesome. Any evidence that there are major problems with it or are you just making stuff up now?





Member since:
2005-07-24
I suspect that they chose QT for Google Earth for reasons relating to your possibility #1: The devs on that particular project were C++ guys. And then possibility #2 took hold as reality set in.
QT always seems to be presented as the "shiny" solution. But where are the results?
Google, to its credit, is a company that learns from its past mistakes.