Linked by Nescio on Mon 9th Mar 2009 08:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 352479
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What about if intent to profit - change argument?
by gcbirzan on Tue 10th Mar 2009 16:21
in reply to "RE: What about if intent to profit - change argument?"
Psystar doesn't need a license to install OSX on their computers. You think every single computer maker has an agreement with Microsoft to install Windows? They don't, and they don't need one.
You are patently (har har) wrong. You do need a license to install it on a computer. As does anyone who wants to install Windows. The agreement is called EULA.
RE[3]: What about if intent to profit - change argument
by Bobthearch on Tue 10th Mar 2009 16:46
in reply to "RE[2]: What about if intent to profit - change argument?"




Member since:
2006-01-27
Psystar doesn't need a license to install OSX on their computers. You think every single computer maker has an agreement with Microsoft to install Windows? They don't, and they don't need one.
Nor do they need a license with Intel to resell Pentium processors, nor do they need a license with Nvidia to resell graphic cards, nor do they need a license with Kingston to resell RAM...