Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Privacy, Security, Encryption Fresh from winning the PWN2OWN contest yesterday, Charlie Miller has been interviewed by ZDNet. He talks about how Mac OS X is a very simple operating system to exploit due to the lack of any form of anti-exploit features. He also explains that the underlying operating system is much more important in creating a successful exploit than the bowser, why Chrome is so hard to hack, and many other things.
Thread beginning with comment 354142
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
nickinvictoria
Member since:
2009-03-20

I just cant understand why, readers of this article don't get it..... Miller says "The things that Windows do to make it harder [for an exploit to work], Macs don't do," Miller says, "Hacking into Macs is so much easier. You don't have to jump through hoops and deal with all the anti-exploit mitigations you'd find in Windows."

FACTS:
I own a Mac, Umbuntu and Windoze box.....
Out of the three, my mac is the easiest to break into.
Anyone sitting on a Mac like me, your system is vunerable.
This is not life or death (Ford example) situation.
He is show casing his talent for hire.
If Apple is serious about finding bugs they should pay him for his information.
Chrome is harder to crack

Beliefs and facts are very different.... Don't get lost in ability to think critically because of your love for a stupid operating system or technology. Apple is in business to make money or take your money. When the warranty goes on your Mac don't expect Apple to fix it for free, and don't expect someone out there in cyberspace to help Apple for FREE.

Reply Score: 4