Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Mar 2009 19:59 UTC, submitted by shaneco
Thread beginning with comment 355597
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: unfortunately true
by darknexus on Sat 28th Mar 2009 11:43
in reply to "RE[2]: unfortunately true"
Except that when that new, eight hour battery ends up hosed for whatever reason, it's not user-replaceable.
Seriously, I like OS X and generally find Apple's systems to be suited to my needs as well as the os's tight integration with the provided hardware. But let's not fool ourselves, ok? Current Macs differ from standard PCs in two respects: their external design, which is irrelevant to the internal hardware, and the use of EFI rather than bios for the bootstrapping. That's it. The rest of the hardware is just stock PC parts, and not always particularly good ones at that. The days when Apple was differentiated from a standard PC at the hardware level died when they switched to Intel from PPC.




Member since:
2007-01-01
The $700 difference between the MacBook and MacBook Pro (not $1000) is more than just a larger screen.
- larger screen
- faster processor
- larger hard drive
- second display adapter
- illuminated keyboard
For some people it well worth the extra $700