Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Apr 2009 22:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 356529
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: No one had those lofty expectations
by Hiev on Thu 2nd Apr 2009 23:22
in reply to "No one had those lofty expectations"
But Linux did make inroads on both of those occasions. More computers come with Linux now than ever before, and that's at least partially because of Vista and netbooks. What's the problem?
The problem is that NetBooks had made of linux the most uninstalled OS in the planet.
RE[2]: No one had those lofty expectations
by Ford Prefect on Thu 2nd Apr 2009 23:52
in reply to "RE: No one had those lofty expectations"
RE[2]: No one had those lofty expectations
by bert64 on Fri 3rd Apr 2009 08:46
in reply to "RE: No one had those lofty expectations"
But Linux did make inroads on both of those occasions. More computers come with Linux now than ever before, and that's at least partially because of Vista and netbooks. What's the problem?
The problem is that NetBooks had made of linux the most uninstalled OS in the planet.
The problem is that NetBooks had made of linux the most uninstalled OS in the planet.
The distributions shipped with netbooks were almost universally garbage and all different... I have an eee 901 which came with xandros and hated the preinstalled os.







Member since:
2006-01-17
So, let me get this straight. Linux was supposed to make inroads into the desktop market when Windows Vista proved to be a flop. Linux failed. Linux was supposed to make inroads when the netbook market emerged. Linux failed.
But Linux did make inroads on both of those occasions. More computers come with Linux now than ever before, and that's at least partially because of Vista and netbooks. What's the problem?
I guess if by inroads you mean "wipes out MS", then Linux failed. But who expected that?