Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Apr 2009 20:09 UTC
3D News, GL, DirectX LinuxFund and the Open Graphics Project are teaming up to raise funds and supply 10 Open Graphics Development boards to open source developers. After several years in development the Open Graphics project is offering pre-orders of development boards. The Open Graphics Project aims to design an open source hardware/open architecture and standard for graphics cards, primarily targeting free software/open source operating systems. LinuxFund is accepting donations on their website to help fund the project. Additionally you can pre-order an OGD1 board for yourself through Traversal Technology.
Thread beginning with comment 358502
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Good Luck
by abraxas on Tue 14th Apr 2009 16:17 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Good Luck"
abraxas
Member since:
2005-07-07

A "top of the line" Nvidia card with no device driver (e.g. using VBE and doing everything in software) would probably be a lot slower than one of these with full support for hardware acceleration. I think you're under-estimating the value of open documentation, especially for every OS that isn't Windows.

-Brendan


While this is true if you can get a system that comes with an onboard Intel video card that has better performance, for a lower price, and has open source drivers then what niche will this card fill? AMD/ATI has also been opening up documentation and providing code.

I applaud the effort but the graphics stack and documentation has come a long way since this project was conceived and its relevance is in question if it cannot offer something above and beyond what is available now. It has to beat existing manufacturers in price, performance, or openness. From the beginning they were gunning for openness but this has changed a great deal in the past couple of years and I doubt they have the resources to offer better performance or a better price.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Good Luck
by gustl on Wed 15th Apr 2009 16:08 in reply to "RE[3]: Good Luck"
gustl Member since:
2006-01-19

It has to beat existing manufacturers in price, performance, or openness. From the beginning they were gunning for openness but this has changed a great deal in the past couple of years and I doubt they have the resources to offer better performance or a better price.


I think it is something of a chicken/egg problem. the efforts around OGD probably made Nvidia and ATI aware that there indeed is a third dimension next to price and performance. And having one open hardware vendor around would ensure ATI and NVIDIA stay open enough.

Whoever is more open will win the Linux market, with performance being of minor importance and the price even less so.
Loads of people are perfectly willing to spend $150 to $200 for a graphics card with a quarter of the performance of a top notch NVIDIA or ATI graphics card which would just cost the same. They would do that because it would mean ultra-long support times in the kernel, no installation/upgrade hassles, just plug an play.

I know it would be the first thing to buy once it is available, and I guess millions on this planet would think similar. I am even thinking of buying the development board once it comes "pre-flashed" as a graphics card, a good documentation how to reprogram it, and some tools to load up the new hardware layout to it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Good Luck
by abraxas on Wed 15th Apr 2009 23:18 in reply to "RE[4]: Good Luck"
abraxas Member since:
2005-07-07

I think it is something of a chicken/egg problem. the efforts around OGD probably made Nvidia and ATI aware that there indeed is a third dimension next to price and performance. And having one open hardware vendor around would ensure ATI and NVIDIA stay open enough.


The problem with this line of thought is that Intel drivers are completely open and probably perform on par or better than this solution. ATI has been releasing docs and code for a little while now. Nvidia is the only one holding back but considering 2 out of the top 3 graphics providers are already offering open code and documentation I don't see where a product based on OGD fits in.

Reply Parent Score: 2