Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Apr 2009 15:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 360847
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-09
Then, no "netbooks" currently available are "netbook" by your definition. All allows changing HD/SSD and memory at least, and expanding it by plug whatever USB devices in. Last but not least, all allows installing/removing any piece of software you want, including the whole OS.
I fail to see why it's a problem. People treat their devices according to *their* needs, not marketing expectations.
It's 2009. Whatever computing device limited on purpose to do only a small set of what it's capable and marketed as a trash-it-buy-newer-one is definitively out of my scope.
I've discovered bringing a thin phone which does only phone and my own Samsung NC10 + company-given 3G+ USB key is a better combo for me than the company-given iPhone alone. On battery time alone, it's... apple and orange (pun intended).
I don't care what iPhone fans think about that, but clearly Apple *should* have care more : asserting their product cover better my needs doesn't make it true, sorry.
Edited 2009-04-28 15:18 UTC