Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th May 2009 10:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 363427
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-05
The problem with all these fines is that they are after the fact, sometimes years after given the glacial pace of due process. This means that damage done is probably undoable and what the guilty party has really managed is buying market share. They pay for it in legal costs instead of through marketing, for example. And if the fine isn't large enough, of course, then the company may well have bought that market share at a bargain price.
I've no idea what the answer is. A fine is better than nothing but it is still not really a solution.
Edited 2009-05-13 16:15 UTC