To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: what a sharp contrast
I had no problem moving on - I was already a Java and Visual C++ developer, so C# and VB.Net are much more preferable languages for me. I was taking about some of the "VB Guys" out there who struggled with OOP ,which wasn't necessary with VB6. Even when I did VB6, I did it in a very Object-oriented way. I had a full framework of classes for each application - I very much prefer an MVC development style.
Sometimes it is ok to feel compassionate towards the struggle of other, even if you do not struggle with it. That's why I am glad that Microsoft is creating Smallbasic:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/devlabs/cc950524.aspx
Do you know what the word "context" means? There is no issue with reusing the same H/W for different purposes. There is however an issue with working on that platform. Witch is essentially the most closed off platform out there. And platform means both hardware AND software.
And RTFA for more evidence that Apple is closed off.
As another piece of evidence, they whined and bitched about supporting Java, and look at how they treat it afterwards... Updates are late, bugs unpatched, versions are unavailable for products that are 3 years old and so on...
Well yes actually you do. The iPhone doesn't belong to whoever buys it, you're merely rent it. It's the same for their OS's as well, you license it off them rather than own it.
It's a known fact these proprietary companies do such things,(Apple in this case) since you give away your rights and freedom agreeing to their licenses.
You’re not giving away anything. No company can take your rights away.
You don’t rent the iPhone, you buy a unit of it. Be it subsidized or not. Likewise, you don’t license the OS, you buy a copy of it and you can do whatever you want with it since it’s your propriety. I can use the OS X DVD to cut cheese or tear the DVD apart if I want.
Don’t be fooled into this “we license it to you” BS that companies want you to believe. You sure don’t license a car or a book, why should it be any different for gadgets or software?
VB.net is not a successor to VB6, but it is heavily inspired by it.
The thing with VB6 is that it was a horrible mess from both a syntax and an API point of view that you sorta just had to memorize to get anything done in. VB.net is a far better designed platform, and I can't think of a single thing that was removed. I think the big problem was that VB devs were forced to up their game, and really learn OO concepts, which they didn't want to do.




Member since:
2005-07-06
I am primarily a Linux dude, but I have also been employed as a Windows developer (VC++, VB Classic, C#, etc). One thing Microsoft has always done well is treat their developer community well. The ISV's are the heart and soul of the Microsoft platform. The only time I remember them mis-treating their developer community was when they axed VB classic. VB.Net is NOT a successor to VB6, it is a totally different platform. They totally dis-respected their VB community.
However, when you decide to do the dance with companies like Apple and Microsoft, you knew who was in control. IMHO, Apple is a MUCH more closed company than Microsoft. I feel like when you buy an Apple product that they are merely "renting" it to you - even the computer itself.
Go Android! Go Moblin!