Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Jun 2009 21:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 369968
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-04-17
As much as I like Apple's GUI aesthetics - Quartz's font rendering is an absolute deal breaker for me. I much prefer the way fonts look with Microsoft's ClearType subpixel rendering (after proper tuning of course). That is for every-day stuff like web browsing and email that involves a lot of reading.
In situations where I need an accurate representation of what a typeface will look like in print, it's most likely in an application that has its own rendering engine anyway - InDesign in my case. Adobe's engine is called CoolType and produces results quite similar to those of Quartz as far as I can tell.