To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So why not work with Mandriva - they really seem to be focused on KDE (not that they have a bad GNOME implementation - actually I've read shining reviews of Mandriva from GNOME users as well). I think I read somewhere that KDE is looking for a "shocase" distribution - if that's true, you need to find one that already has a good "baseline". As far as I know (and I have tested the big four - Kubuntu/OpenSuse/Mandriva/Fedora - Mandriva is by far the most polished of all, and they seem to help out with other parts of the KDE software stack (like porting K3B to QT4).
Aaah, Mandriva. Personally, I like what they do, altough they don't ship KDE vanilla (very very far from it, but the same goes for Suse) and their tools are GTK based. Problem is that Mandriva isn't one of the big boys, and has proven to be a bit unstable (as a company) in the past. And their software infrastructure simply can't hold the candle to the top-three (suse, debian/Ubuntu and Red Hat).
But I wouldn't be against it - it would just take some ppl to push it forward.





Member since:
2005-07-07
The issue is that just keeping up with all the changes in the FOSS/linux software stack is a lot of work, and improving things is another hunk. They're just too much short on ppl and without commitment from Canonical (which invests 99% in Gnome despite having 30% KDE users) it's not gonna improve.