Linked by snydeq on Mon 14th Sep 2009 21:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 384125
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-09-26
That is exactly what they are doing. There is nothing magical about the "commercial" version of Mono included in MonoTouch except it does not come with the "no static linking" clause of the LGPL. It is the exact same code.
Mono's .Net classes are exactly the same as well, and are still MIT. (No special licensing required.)
The part that is proprietary is the CocoaTouch libraries which were developed solely by Novell and have never been open source.