Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Tue 29th Sep 2009 19:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 386890
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There have been laptops shipping with instant On OS for a while now, so its certainly doable.Maybe it wasn't in the 90s, but its doable now. These aren't really full dual-booting systems though, we aren't talking about buying something with Ubuntu and Win7 side by side, this is a stripped down linux. It is fairly interesting that they are shipping a system with both ARM and Intel chips with a flavor of linux booting on the ARM and Windows on the Intel, I never really expected to see that.
RE[2]: Comment by Stephen!
by kaiwai on Wed 30th Sep 2009 03:21
in reply to "RE: Comment by Stephen!"
On what planet does Microsoft get to say what non-Microsoft software one is "forbidden" to run on ones machine?
OEM agreement - I suggest you look at the Be Inc. Versus Microsoft case. I am unsure what the situation is today but as so far as what has happened in the past - Microsoft has placed restrictions within the large OEM contracts. Restrictions included not replacing or offering an alternative to Internet Explorer icon on the desktop with an alternative browser, providing a dual boot system. The list goes on and on with the number of restrictions - which is what sparked the whole DOJ case off.
Too bad Judge Jackson opened his mouth and started blabbering on about Bill Gates having a Nepoleonic complex which Microsoft lawyers used to claim that the judge was biased an had an agenda against Microsoft. Had Judge Jackson kept his big trap shut - we'd be talking about Microsoft Operating Systems Ltd. and Microsoft Applications Ltd. - and the new copy of Microsoft Office running on Linux.
Edited 2009-09-30 03:22 UTC







Member since:
2007-11-24
Isn't dual-boot of Windows/Linux usually forbidden by microsoft?