Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Oct 2009 22:03 UTC, submitted by mbpark
Thread beginning with comment 390009
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-24
Not really. If they start getting an actual market share of x86, however, then that will get Microsoft's attention. There are countless operating systems for the x86 architecture and the only ones that are officially on Microsoft's radar are Mac OSX and Linux.
Microsoft doesn't even care about *BSD which will likely have a bigger slice of the pie over AmigaOS/x86 for a long time to come.
That being said, I'd probably buy a copy of AmigaOS/x86 if it became available. But that doesn't mean I'd drop Windows or Linux for it.
EDIT: There are actually several variants of Linux that Microsoft is worried about. Ubuntu, Moblin, and Chrome are probably the three biggest.
Edited 2009-10-19 12:05 UTC